The Trump vs Biden Debate: Who Will Show Up For Biden? An Imposter?

While we are distracted by deep fake videos and photographs, the 2019 interview with the CIA Director of Disguise brings up more prominent concerns regarding the upcoming debate between Biden and Trump.   Jonna Mendez returns to the forefront with her intriguing story about the CIA disguise evolution that surpassed – Hollywood expectations.  The CIA showed us their capabilities in Mrs. Doubtfire – 1993.   Twenty years ago.   Progress has been extraordinary!

Instead of being concerned about Biden passing a drug test for the debate, it is more likely they will be inserting a double wearing one of the CIA’s finest masks.   Someone prepped enough to make a few blunders, but not enough to disgrace Biden.   Someone the media will portray as a ‘fine specimen’.  KEY:  Turning up the heat, brightening the lights, could become quite uncomfortable with a silicon shield over one’s face – while showing no perspiration.

Hillary Clinton recently made an appearance for Hollywood sporting a full Mumu, her face aglow, and simply coveting the applause as she absorbs her fame and laments she coulda been Queen.  Yet her purple and blue crippled hands were a very visible dichotomy.   Exposing some serious condition reminiscent of King Charles.   The only two visible archives of flesh.   Was she wearing a mask?   Her eyes were blue.  Was she wearing contacts or was she the double?

Who will show up for the Debate?

Does a debate ever actually change someone’s mind?

The first debate was in 1858 between Lincoln and Senator Douglas.  Each candidate spoke for 1 ½ hours, the other candidate had an 1 ½ to rebut with his arguments – and then the other candidate did the same.  A six hour static event.  No moderators.  In 1948 republicans would debate each other via the radio.  It wasn’t until 1956 that the democrats followed suit but televised the interactions.  The first televised and moderated debate was between Kennedy and Nixon.  Kennedy won on 'charm'.

Most people that watch debates are securely fixed to their candidate and simply want to see how the dominoes fall.   I don’t watch debates because they typically revert to screaming matches, I become agitated and start pacing before shutting the annoyance off.   Anymore, ratings and viewership are another meaningless algorithm based on a box connected to their TV that records what time they turn on the tube  and what channel.   From this, the world of science extrapolates reams of false data that might as well be a tall tale of fantasy after fantasy.  Much like how historians write history.

Only 24 countries bother with the Western debate fabrication.   It is costly, a waste of time, and moderators are hugely biased, as in CNN the representative this time despite their ratings in twallette water.

Kennedy is furious he wasn’t able to qualify – He reached 15% in 3 ‘approved polls’ but needed a fourth in order to qualify.  One such poll is Gallup, a benchmark since the 1930’s.   But the methodology has changed significantly.   Today, Gallup uses ‘surveys’ via telephone calls weights the responses of 1,000 people based on age, education, gender, ethnicity, and region.  Jon Clifton is the current CEO, whose interest include the UAE and Mohamed Younis Editor in Chief, a democrat.  Gallup has contracts with the State Department and Department of Justice.  In 2013, Gallup was sued by the Department of Justice under the “False Claims Act”.  Gallup settled and paid $10.5 million.  Gallop made no predictions of the 2016 election.  Gallops accuracy is now ranked 17^th.

The use of surveys to determine anything seems no different than a Ouija Board.   It isn’t a factoid, it isn’t expert analysis, it is a crystal ball and a lot of bribery.  Last I heard, Kennedy was trailing with 4+% - no idea how he suddenly managed 15%, but money will buy most anything.  A look into these ‘unbiased’ polls reveals what and who:

YouGov/Economist:  The Economist is a far left Rothschild rag magazine which runs the Zionist show.

Beacon Research and Shaw Company = Fox News:  Their claim to fame is that these use ‘live interviewers who call from a predetermined file of national voters.   However, their website states their respondents are from ‘online’ surveys.   Beacon research Founder = Chris Anderson, a Democrat.  Co-Founder = Matthew Shelter, a Democrat.  Shaw and Company is D. E. Shaw an Obama appointee in 2009 as a Science and Tech Advisor…

BIAS.

ActiVote:  Which does not publish its methodology.  ActiVote’s co-founder in 2019 is from the Netherlands and relocated to Philadelphia  2010.  It is unclear if he has dual citizenship or just Dutch, which could be considered election interference and/or a foreign agent requiring registration.  Their app is used to ‘educate voters on the issues’ before having them respond to the survey.  Their website nauseatingly talks about their fight for ‘Democracy’.

These are the three main survey companies used today and they all show Trump and Biden neck-in-neck. The THREE main polling companies that don’t even bother polling, but instead due their due diligence via mediocre surveys that they can scrub and manipulate owned and operated by liberals and democrats.  They make millions selling their propaganda to our US Government and governments around the world.   The idea is to sway those voters who vote for whoever appears to be winning so they can claim to be on the winning team.   A behavioral pattern of mass hysteria.

But the purpose is clear.  When counting the Biden votes they will use these polls as their guiding star to uphold Biden’s Leap to victory.  Supplemented by shopped AI – the latest of which shows Biden at a massive Pennsylvania rally with midgets and fake people as the backdrop.  Sloppy.  But what they cannot afford is for Biden to LOSE.   And a fake masked Biden seems a plausible solution.