Victoria Nuland, head of US State Department, has officially stated in a video conference with Kyiv that WWIII will effectively begin on July 11th stating that the US and its partners will fight as long as it takes – 16 years or more… The scheduled date was chosen to coincide with the NATO Summit, a one day meeting in Lithuania. I wonder how much this WAR will affect climate change… And what happened to the deadline 2030 for all things Great RESET?
Two months away, and NATO has yet to determine the topic for the Summit. But I imagine it will involve WWIII and how to protect Europe from the inevitable backlash. How many F-16’s will make it to Ukraine without crashing or being ‘exploded’ midair might be on the table for discussion as well.
It would appear that giving up Ukraine simply isn’t on the dining table at the haute enclave residence of Soros. The sheer size of his destroyed investments throughout Ukraine are in the hundreds of billions. He is being repaid by US tax dollars - but not without an open debt ceiling... And Zelenskyy has apparently expanded his real estate holdings to now include a villa in Italy from which he runs the war. Or runs ‘away’ whichever the case may be.
The defacto US and EU trying to pretend they are not involved has fallen. The pretenses are mute and the reality has been openly spilled by Nuland. The event where Nuland spoke was co-chaired by the US Atlantic Council whose representative declared, “transatlantic unity and robust support can help Ukraine defeat Russia and renew European security.”
The Atlantic Council calls itself nonpartisan because that is the only way to register a 501©(3) charity. They are anything but ‘charitable’. While they do NOT provide the legally required Form 990 for public view, their nonaudited financials reveal they are NOT a charity at all. But then they own the IRS. Funding sources for the Council come from the common array of leftist sources; Rockefeller, Goldman, Facebook, Google, US State Depart, ie Nuland, – however, one stand out funder is Burisma Holdings. The same Burisma that was paying Hunter Biden and Big Daddy.
The Circle is Complete.
The reason the NGO’s are going ballistic over the debt ceiling is that the bulk of their funding is Discretionary spending. Discretionary spending recipients are supposed to be the last to receive funding after Mandatory debts, which includes Social Security and Veteran pay. Goldman Sachs has stated that the US Treasury has just $30 billion in its vault – the bare minimum. But that doesn’t even begin to make sense given we are in the midst of tax season which garnered $4.9 trillion in Treasury Funds last year… Where are our Tax Dollars?
John Rogers is Chairman of the Board of the Atlantic Council while serving as Executive VP of Goldman Sachs. His wife is a journalist with the Huffington Post and previously worked in the Clinton Administration. Cozy Group.
We thus have linked Clinton, Soros, Rockefeller, Department of State, the Atlantic Council and the current WH establishment to the Agenda of assassinating Putin. All while invoking Peace and using US Taxpayer Funding to achieve this end.
Although Nuland called the upcoming July 11th attack a ‘counteroffensive’ the target is Moscow. The point is to militarily take out Putin and insert a provisional government with Navalny at the head of the table.
The global response to a Putin assassination would be interesting indeed. Although there is no mention of Lavrov, Putin’s right hand man, it is likely he has access to the ‘red button’. And Russia is quite aware who can be spared, and who cannot in the continuance of Russia as an independent nation. Russia’s Medvedev has stated that a preemptive nuclear strike would only be undertaken should Western nations provide Kyiv with a nuclear weapon. Otherwise all weapons will be tit-for-tat.
What is strikingly NOT on the table is any discussions of a peace deal by Western governments.
Contrary to an interview posted by General Milley in which he declares a counteroffensive is not forthcoming, the Atlantic Council’s, Richard Hooker, Jr. details the means: Attack Crimea in June affecting massive civilian losses to morally debilitate Russians using special ops from the US and UK. Take out the land bridge between Crimea and Russia. Then drive a northern advancement to retake all Russian occupied territory. Without F-16’s.
The largess fear of striking The Bear is the retaliation possibility of nukes aimed at various points throughout the EU and possibly Washington, DC. By contrast, unleashing a nuke on Russian soil is NOT preferred given these Cabalists still vie for Russia’s vast wealth of Resources – black soil and Lake Baikal.
What happened? what went wrong for them? It seems from the behaviour, the one thing the elites want is that the planet and it's resources must be preserved for them or what's the point? Sure burn millions of acres of land to drive the populous into the pens - Who needs Koala bears when you're in control of a planet entirely dedicated to your needs? The trees will grow back, why the Koala might too but nuclear exchange? It leads me to think that the rhetoric is just that. Either the elites control everything and the war is a bigger scam distraction than we thought,. Just how intensive is the fighting, it all seems shelling of DPR and LPR, border skirmishes, clashes over villages (last one in the "counteroffensive" was pop . 450) and WW1 trench tactics.. Reported 400k deaths, are you sure? Heard any reports of WWII Kursk style tank battles but 1000's of vehicles destroyed? in battle or just on invoices? Is this really just part of the process to bankrupt the west, destroy the fiat money system and replace it with Totalitarian NWO where they will own everything with willing apparatchiks and militarised police (Armed IRS for goodness sake) Perhaps most importantly a corrupt justice system to provide an air of "legal" respectability to the control. It's very easy to say "I won't comply" but when people are staving, morals will soon be forgotten.
Perhaps nuclear capability does not exist in any real sense of the word? This needs a hugely complicated and of course expensive infrastructure to work properly and be maintained. The Russians were devastated in the 90's after the destruction of the USSR. Was there any money for deterrent when it was difficult to get bread in Moscow? The US backed oligarchs who swept in to take the "means of production back from the worker" would not be funding it. Photos of rusting nuclear subs seemed to abound. If say like after NASA which has bled untold billions from the taxpayers pockets for so long, can we really say there is a functional deterrent in place even with new "compact" delivery methods such as hypersonic missiles with nuclear payload capability? (The DOD recently said they cancelled such tests - can't get the delivery system working yet?). In a similar fashion, comments that very little weaponry reaches Eastern Ukraine and what does is old NATO and US stockpiles promised to be replaced at today costs, just part of the scam. Where did all the defence budget go? Can't make enough shells - what? Just for a moment consider that the majors powers agreed to construct the MAD scenario at some point and use it as yet another money syphon while providing the required control by fear, hatred and popular support of policy for both sides of the cold war to support the expenditure (read theft)? We will never know, but nothing would surprise me, one thing for sure either way, there will never be a nuclear exchange. Oh Dear, just realised I'm getting distracted
Should read Armstrongeconomics.com/blog to see hidden info, and gain knowledge of the science of predicting the future???