War is good for killing people and destroying stuff.
This analogy will make sense once one reads to the end :
A friend and I went elk hunting in Colorado, where I lived once, with our bow and arrows. He was gifted one, and we were in deep woods. When he downed his, I wanted one too and so followed the herd deeper into the woods. I had a shot at one, but came to my senses and didn't take it because it'd be hard enough hauling the first one out. And it did take two days to do so.
Anyway, I mention this because after We nuked Japan - and after the war with them was essentially over - We fire bombed 57 of the largest Japanese cities. ( To image what fire bombing a city involves, read Curt Vonnegut's description about Dresden being fire bombed). I can just imagine that our military personnel involved had a sort of feeding frenzy, kind of like my wanting to get another elk, and so proceeded with bombing and burning countless of Japanese men, women and children, for no reason.
Many years ago I had two thoughts about Jews/Israel ( Zionists ) :
Why do Jews buy Mercedes Benz automobiles ? After what was supposedly done to them by Germany, why buy that prestige car ?
And, maybe my second observation explains it. The wall around the Gaza Strip is not any different than one of the German concentration camps.
So, an answer to my question might be that the Jews admire, respect - maybe fearfully so - the power they had over the Jews and so the Jews have, as a response, cow-towed and imitated them out of this "respect and admiration ".
One could argue that, " Well, Mercedes is the best. " But, that's not true. I think there's something to it........
" Feeding frenzy " - A disease only humans catch.
Speaking of Colorado. I had a friend there who told me that he came across some hunters who had trapped a herd of Elk at the edge of a cliff and then proceeded to shoot the Elk, out of what ? - sick fun or something. My friend was perched above them with his gun and said he was tempted to shoot the hunters because he was so upset. Is there any hope for us ?
Concentration camps were a British invention- links back to British renamed to Windsor for a reason - maybe it was because it was so blatant that they were involved in extermination of the Afrikaner race as in South Africa prior to WWI.
It is clear to some. The House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha as a British dynasty was short-lived. It encompassed the reign of King Edward VII, who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early years of the twentieth century, and the first seven years of his son, King George V, who replaced the German-sounding title with that of Windsor in 1917during the First World War.
Now know wiki is a source of truth if you read between the lines.
George, in his accession speech to Parliament, proclaimed: "Born and educated in this country, I glory in the name of Britain." He inserted this phrase into the speech, written by Lord Hardwicke, to demonstrate his desire to distance himself from his German forebears, who were perceived as caring more for Hanover than for Britain.
Now you know why German cars were so love. Just saying
The following is a brief yet exceedingly vital history lesson. I've written it to try and keep our future generations free from the impending Jewish enslavement. Those with eyes to see and ears to hear soon had better grow a pair and start repeating this in polite company, or you will forever seal their fate to the enemy of humanity.
One piece of propaganda, which is still widely espoused, is if the "Nazis" won World War II, we would all be speaking German because Hitler wanted to take over the world.
There are just two little itty-bitty facts that obliterate this big lie. Germany didn't build the most crucial weapon of World War II, the aircraft carrier, not one. Also, Germany built very few long-range heavy bombers, the second most indispensable weapon of World War II, and those few manufactured came into service relatively late in the war.
So, trying to take over the world without both of these exceedingly essential weapons of war made this disinformation a ludicrous impossibility.
But simple facts didn't stop the almost entirely owned Jewish media from spreading this blatant and illogical misrepresentation far and wide. So pervasive was their big lie that 77 years later, countless midwits are still parroting this utter nonsense.
This was a classic case of Jewish projection and calculated misdirection, for they were the culprits who took over the world and used the military of the four biggest countries they already completely controlled, the US, UK, USSR, and France, to attack Germany. It didn't stop with the big four, they pressured dozens of others countries in which they controlled to declare war on Germany.
Your statement is incorrect - you question your statement - Do you understand WWI? There was no Middle East until the US, Britain and France partitioned it and appointed rulers. There was no Israel until Rothschild confiscated Palestine land. What the fark is your point?
Oh dear. Let me make it farking clear There was no Palestine, there was no nation called Palestine. Palestinians were not the first settlers nor occupiers of the Holy Lands I'll help you further and you won't like it as it destroys your narrative.
The name Palestine originates from the Philistine inheritance of the land of Judea. The ancient Romans pinned the name on the Land of Israel. In 135 CE, after stamping out the province of Judea’s second insurrection, the Romans renamed the province Syria Palaestina—that is, “Palestinian Syria.” They did so resentfully, as a punishment, to obliterate the link between the Jews (in Hebrew, Y’hudim and in Latin Judaei) and the province (the Hebrew name of which was Y’hudah). “Palaestina” referred to the Philistines, whose home base had been on the Mediterranean coast.
I will provide you with some more unpalatable facts provided by another bloke Terry Burton from Canada. I quote verbatim.
" Maybe the following will provide a modicum of historical information regarding the now present State of Israel and its proximal geography, as it relates to who was in control:
1) Before the modern state of Israel there was the British Mandate, Not a Palestinian state.
2) Before the British Mandate there was the Ottoman Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
3) Before the Ottoman Empire there was the Islamic Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt, Not a Palestinian state.
4) Before the Islamic Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt there was the Ayyubid Dynasty, Not a Palestinian state. Godfrey of bouillon conquered it in 1099.
5) Before the Ayyubid Dynasty there was the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, Not a Palestinian state.
6) Before the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem there was the Fatimid Caliphate, Not a Palestinian state.
7) Before the Fatimid Caliphate there was the Byzantine Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
8) Before the Byzantine Empire there was the Roman Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
9) Before the Roman Empire there was the Hasmonaean Dynasty, Not a Palestinian state.
10) Before the Hasmoneans Dynasty there was the Seleucid Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
11) Before the Seleucid Empire there was the Empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon, Not a Palestinian state.
12) Before the Empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon there was the Persian empire, Not a Palestinian state.
13) Before the Persian Empire there was the Babylonian Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
14) Before the Babylonian Empire there was the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea, Not a Palestinian state.
15) Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea there was the Kingdom of Israel, Not a Palestinian state.
16) Before the Kingdom of Israel there was the Theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel, Not a Palestinian state.
17) Before the Theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel there was the individual state of Canaan, Not a Palestinian state.
In fact in this corner of the earth there was everything but a Palestinian state!"
The word Jew was not coined until sometime in the 16th century when scribes rewrote the King James Bible to alter the history. The Hebrew language is a bastardization of the language of Canaanites. It also didn’t exist until well into the 10th century AD. There are zero original texts of Pleny the Elder. In fact, most of history was actually written in the 11th to 17th centuries AD. Including Plato and Aristotle.
The Roman Empire was founded by two mythological brothers - Remus and Romulus.
So you see SIR - your attempt at legitimizing Jews is based on mythology written in the 10th to 16th century. To obscure the Money Changers of Jesus ridicule. - A Jesus Jews believe is rotting in a vat of Semen in Hell.
There was no nation called Israel. Before Christ there was Edom, Ammon, Phoenicia, Philistia, Aram and Hamath.
After Christ there was Judea, Samaria, Galilea, Phoenicia, Perea, and Decapolis.
IF you recall - Jesus detested the money-changers. Those peoples were called Canaanites. The Canaanites were systematically expelled from every country for their corruption and usury. The ultimately emptied into Khazar. Where they changed their names and their religion to obscure who they were - as pariahs of Christ.
War is the only activity that guarantees huge profits. I suspect that's all we really need to know about it, if we want to understand why we simply cannot live without it.
War is good for killing people and destroying stuff.
This analogy will make sense once one reads to the end :
A friend and I went elk hunting in Colorado, where I lived once, with our bow and arrows. He was gifted one, and we were in deep woods. When he downed his, I wanted one too and so followed the herd deeper into the woods. I had a shot at one, but came to my senses and didn't take it because it'd be hard enough hauling the first one out. And it did take two days to do so.
Anyway, I mention this because after We nuked Japan - and after the war with them was essentially over - We fire bombed 57 of the largest Japanese cities. ( To image what fire bombing a city involves, read Curt Vonnegut's description about Dresden being fire bombed). I can just imagine that our military personnel involved had a sort of feeding frenzy, kind of like my wanting to get another elk, and so proceeded with bombing and burning countless of Japanese men, women and children, for no reason.
UGH - not aware of that … however a feeding frenzy of torture on humans is - well IDF dancing on bodies. I live in Colorado
Many years ago I had two thoughts about Jews/Israel ( Zionists ) :
Why do Jews buy Mercedes Benz automobiles ? After what was supposedly done to them by Germany, why buy that prestige car ?
And, maybe my second observation explains it. The wall around the Gaza Strip is not any different than one of the German concentration camps.
So, an answer to my question might be that the Jews admire, respect - maybe fearfully so - the power they had over the Jews and so the Jews have, as a response, cow-towed and imitated them out of this "respect and admiration ".
One could argue that, " Well, Mercedes is the best. " But, that's not true. I think there's something to it........
" Feeding frenzy " - A disease only humans catch.
Speaking of Colorado. I had a friend there who told me that he came across some hunters who had trapped a herd of Elk at the edge of a cliff and then proceeded to shoot the Elk, out of what ? - sick fun or something. My friend was perched above them with his gun and said he was tempted to shoot the hunters because he was so upset. Is there any hope for us ?
Concentration camps were a British invention- links back to British renamed to Windsor for a reason - maybe it was because it was so blatant that they were involved in extermination of the Afrikaner race as in South Africa prior to WWI.
It is clear to some. The House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha as a British dynasty was short-lived. It encompassed the reign of King Edward VII, who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early years of the twentieth century, and the first seven years of his son, King George V, who replaced the German-sounding title with that of Windsor in 1917during the First World War.
Now know wiki is a source of truth if you read between the lines.
George, in his accession speech to Parliament, proclaimed: "Born and educated in this country, I glory in the name of Britain." He inserted this phrase into the speech, written by Lord Hardwicke, to demonstrate his desire to distance himself from his German forebears, who were perceived as caring more for Hanover than for Britain.
Now you know why German cars were so love. Just saying
Everything you wrote is correct. It makes me sick!!!!
I don't think Trump wants escalation, but I do not think that he has the power to stop it.
The MIC is in control. Only a collision with reality can stop them.
We can only hope that sanity will prevail before the nukes start flying.
Agree.
Shortly after I posted the above I watched this, explaining the point in great detail:
https://youtu.be/iaKA1ACb7V8?si=vT91oWQyo6MBR_Gb
Hitler Wanted To Take Over The World
The following is a brief yet exceedingly vital history lesson. I've written it to try and keep our future generations free from the impending Jewish enslavement. Those with eyes to see and ears to hear soon had better grow a pair and start repeating this in polite company, or you will forever seal their fate to the enemy of humanity.
One piece of propaganda, which is still widely espoused, is if the "Nazis" won World War II, we would all be speaking German because Hitler wanted to take over the world.
There are just two little itty-bitty facts that obliterate this big lie. Germany didn't build the most crucial weapon of World War II, the aircraft carrier, not one. Also, Germany built very few long-range heavy bombers, the second most indispensable weapon of World War II, and those few manufactured came into service relatively late in the war.
So, trying to take over the world without both of these exceedingly essential weapons of war made this disinformation a ludicrous impossibility.
But simple facts didn't stop the almost entirely owned Jewish media from spreading this blatant and illogical misrepresentation far and wide. So pervasive was their big lie that 77 years later, countless midwits are still parroting this utter nonsense.
This was a classic case of Jewish projection and calculated misdirection, for they were the culprits who took over the world and used the military of the four biggest countries they already completely controlled, the US, UK, USSR, and France, to attack Germany. It didn't stop with the big four, they pressured dozens of others countries in which they controlled to declare war on Germany.
by Mark R. Elsis
https://EarthNewspaper.com/Hitler-Wanted-To-Take-Over-The-World-by-Mark-R-Elsis
No. Hitler was goated by Churchill and FDR. Much like the goating of Putin into WWIII.
Dear Helena
I do think you have misunderstood me...
I am well aware of this, and how WWII started.
Hitler's Peace Plans (95 Pages)
by Mark R. Elsis
https://HitlersPeacePlans.com
Mark
"Sounds like Israel/US and Yemen."
Okay, so you think that is correct?
Does in not strike you that neither Israel or Yemen were countries until after the First world war?
There is the hole in your hypothesis.
Your statement is incorrect - you question your statement - Do you understand WWI? There was no Middle East until the US, Britain and France partitioned it and appointed rulers. There was no Israel until Rothschild confiscated Palestine land. What the fark is your point?
Oh dear. Let me make it farking clear There was no Palestine, there was no nation called Palestine. Palestinians were not the first settlers nor occupiers of the Holy Lands I'll help you further and you won't like it as it destroys your narrative.
The name Palestine originates from the Philistine inheritance of the land of Judea. The ancient Romans pinned the name on the Land of Israel. In 135 CE, after stamping out the province of Judea’s second insurrection, the Romans renamed the province Syria Palaestina—that is, “Palestinian Syria.” They did so resentfully, as a punishment, to obliterate the link between the Jews (in Hebrew, Y’hudim and in Latin Judaei) and the province (the Hebrew name of which was Y’hudah). “Palaestina” referred to the Philistines, whose home base had been on the Mediterranean coast.
I will provide you with some more unpalatable facts provided by another bloke Terry Burton from Canada. I quote verbatim.
" Maybe the following will provide a modicum of historical information regarding the now present State of Israel and its proximal geography, as it relates to who was in control:
1) Before the modern state of Israel there was the British Mandate, Not a Palestinian state.
2) Before the British Mandate there was the Ottoman Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
3) Before the Ottoman Empire there was the Islamic Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt, Not a Palestinian state.
4) Before the Islamic Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt there was the Ayyubid Dynasty, Not a Palestinian state. Godfrey of bouillon conquered it in 1099.
5) Before the Ayyubid Dynasty there was the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, Not a Palestinian state.
6) Before the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem there was the Fatimid Caliphate, Not a Palestinian state.
7) Before the Fatimid Caliphate there was the Byzantine Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
8) Before the Byzantine Empire there was the Roman Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
9) Before the Roman Empire there was the Hasmonaean Dynasty, Not a Palestinian state.
10) Before the Hasmoneans Dynasty there was the Seleucid Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
11) Before the Seleucid Empire there was the Empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon, Not a Palestinian state.
12) Before the Empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon there was the Persian empire, Not a Palestinian state.
13) Before the Persian Empire there was the Babylonian Empire, Not a Palestinian state.
14) Before the Babylonian Empire there was the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea, Not a Palestinian state.
15) Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea there was the Kingdom of Israel, Not a Palestinian state.
16) Before the Kingdom of Israel there was the Theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel, Not a Palestinian state.
17) Before the Theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel there was the individual state of Canaan, Not a Palestinian state.
In fact in this corner of the earth there was everything but a Palestinian state!"
That is my farking point Helena.
The word Jew was not coined until sometime in the 16th century when scribes rewrote the King James Bible to alter the history. The Hebrew language is a bastardization of the language of Canaanites. It also didn’t exist until well into the 10th century AD. There are zero original texts of Pleny the Elder. In fact, most of history was actually written in the 11th to 17th centuries AD. Including Plato and Aristotle.
The Roman Empire was founded by two mythological brothers - Remus and Romulus.
So you see SIR - your attempt at legitimizing Jews is based on mythology written in the 10th to 16th century. To obscure the Money Changers of Jesus ridicule. - A Jesus Jews believe is rotting in a vat of Semen in Hell.
Hey thar - you stole ‘farking’!
There was no nation called Israel. Before Christ there was Edom, Ammon, Phoenicia, Philistia, Aram and Hamath.
After Christ there was Judea, Samaria, Galilea, Phoenicia, Perea, and Decapolis.
IF you recall - Jesus detested the money-changers. Those peoples were called Canaanites. The Canaanites were systematically expelled from every country for their corruption and usury. The ultimately emptied into Khazar. Where they changed their names and their religion to obscure who they were - as pariahs of Christ.
War is the only activity that guarantees huge profits. I suspect that's all we really need to know about it, if we want to understand why we simply cannot live without it.